by Carla Cordoncillo Acosta and Mireia Borrell
Collaborative innovation is gaining recognition as a critical strategy for public organisations, especially when addressing complex “wicked” problems. These challenges demand fresh thinking, and collaboration—particularly in diverse teams—can make all the difference. By bringing together varied perspectives, policymakers can unlock creative solutions that might not emerge in isolated decision-making. Working collaboratively not only expands the range of options but also makes thinking “outside the box” more productive and impactful.
Despite its promise, the concept of “collaborative innovation” is still mostly grounded in theory. Empirical studies are limited, and when they do exist, they often rely on case studies that lump all forms of collaboration together. This approach overlooks the nuances of different collaborative arrangements and makes it difficult to understand how specific types of collaboration contribute to innovation. Some research hints at distinctions among setups, linking them to innovation in theory, but no one has systematically compared their actual impact.
This is where our study steps in. For policymakers to truly harness the potential of collaboration, they need clear evidence about which actors to involve and how. In our recent article published in Policy & Politics entitled “Fostering innovation through collaboration: A comparison of collaborative approaches to policy design”— we examine the innovative potential of different collaborative arrangements. As expected, we find that collaboration—whether within government or with non-public actors—is a game-changer. But there’s a catch: not all contributors bring equal value to the table. Some actors possess greater capacity to innovate than others.
By shedding light on the benefits of various collaborative set-ups, our study bridges the gap between theory and practice in policy innovation. Policymakers can use these findings to better manage collaborative efforts, ensuring they are equipped to tackle today’s most pressing challenges. Ultimately, this work offers a roadmap for transformative change through purposeful collaboration in policy design.
We hope these insights inspire policymakers and stakeholders to reimagine their approach to collaboration and fully leverage its potential to address the complexities of the modern world.
. . .
You can read the original research in Policy & Politics at
Cordoncillo Acosta, C., and Borrell-Porta, M. (2025). Fostering innovation through collaboration: a comparison of collaborative approaches to policy design. Policy & Politics (published online ahead of print 2025), available from: https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2024D000000058
If you enjoyed this blog post, you may also be interested in reading
Carstensen, M. B., and Sørensen, E. (2025). Using bricolage and robustness theory to explain the dynamism of collaborative governance. Policy & Politics (published online ahead of print 2025), available from: https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2024D000000062
Goyal, N., and Howlett, M. (2024). Types of learning and varieties of innovation: how does policy learning enable policy innovation?. Policy & Politics 52, 4, 564-585, available from: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16841388707452
Carlier, N., Aubin, D., and Moyson, S. (2024). The relative effects of diversity on collective learning in local collaborative networks in Belgium. Policy & Politics 52, 4, 648-674, available from: https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2023D000000007
Policy & Politics Journal Blog 